<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>capacity | The Clever Shark</title>
	<atom:link href="https://clevershark.com/tag/capacity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://clevershark.com</link>
	<description>Bits and rants from Tony Emond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">127613282</site>	<item>
		<title>Is Reddit on the path to decline?</title>
		<link>https://clevershark.com/2010/06/is-reddit-on-the-path-to-decline/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-reddit-on-the-path-to-decline</link>
					<comments>https://clevershark.com/2010/06/is-reddit-on-the-path-to-decline/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uptime]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clevershark.com/?p=2016</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For a long time I&#8217;ve been a member of reddit.com, which is a fairly popular blog of sorts, but recently I&#8217;ve started to wonder if it hasn&#8217;t jumped the shark and entered its natural period of decline. I&#8217;m not usually a big fan of the whole &#8220;is this what this site has become&#8221; whines, and &#8230; <a href="https://clevershark.com/2010/06/is-reddit-on-the-path-to-decline/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Is Reddit on the path to decline?</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a long time I&#8217;ve been a member of <a title="Reddit" href="http://reddit.com" target="_self">reddit.com</a>, which is a fairly popular blog of sorts, but recently I&#8217;ve started to wonder if it hasn&#8217;t jumped the shark and entered its natural period of decline.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not usually a big fan of the whole &#8220;is this what this site has become&#8221; whines, and this isn&#8217;t going to be a note about how the content used to be so much better than it is now (although one may say that such naysayers have a point, what with imgur.com now practically being the most prominent source of links). The site has grown tremendously and recruited users from outside its traditional scientist/engineer base to become more of a general content site, although it does have its overall tendencies, viz. atheism and political liberalism.</p>
<p>That being said, over the past few months it seems that the site is succumbing to its own success. Site performance is generally marginal, and during busy times you&#8217;re disturbingly likely to get a 502 error page instead of the comments page you wanted. The search functionality, which was never one of the site&#8217;s strengths, is now basically unusable; when doing a search you&#8217;re most likely to get the message that reddit is &#8220;under heavy load&#8221;. Likewise when you attempt to check your unread messages, you often end up with the picture of the reddit alien sweating while carrying a big object on his back (get it? &#8220;under heavy load&#8221;? harharhar). And of course there has recently been a bit of outright downtime.</p>
<p>The problem is that this just isn&#8217;t supposed to happen, not for a site which prides itself on its tech-heavy roots, and especially not for a site which has been acquired by a large corporation. Availability issues are understandable for sites such as this one, which do not have a server farm available to accommodate an excess of requests; but in reddit&#8217;s case it&#8217;s owned by CondÃ©-Nast, a company with a lot of resources at its disposal. The site has had a few upgrade-related outages in the not-too-distant past. It would appear that the upgrades did not really resolve the underlying issues. It would seem that reddit doesn&#8217;t scale as well as its owners think it does.</p>
<p>At the same time it&#8217;s not like demand for sites such as reddit is showing signs of abating. The site&#8217;s pageviews have grown 1200% since January 2009 (acc. to Alexa) and over 10% in the past three months. So reddit&#8217;s capacity problems, it seems, are only going to get worse with time, especially given that they can&#8217;t really cope now. Which is really odd for a site whose membership could once be relied on to say that they knew 20 programming languages and &#8220;only&#8221; used 5 or 6 on a regular basis&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://clevershark.com/2010/06/is-reddit-on-the-path-to-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2016</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not about speculators.</title>
		<link>https://clevershark.com/2008/06/its-not-about-speculators/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=its-not-about-speculators</link>
					<comments>https://clevershark.com/2008/06/its-not-about-speculators/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clevershark.com/?p=1777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When gas prices reach the levels we&#8217;re seeing now it&#8217;s easy and convenient to blame unnamed shadowy &#8220;speculators&#8221; for the proverbial pain at the pump. The fact is, however, that gas is so expensive because the limits of oil production are being reached while demand is ever increasing.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When gas prices reach the levels we&#8217;re seeing now it&#8217;s easy and convenient to blame unnamed shadowy &#8220;speculators&#8221; for the proverbial pain at the pump. <strong><a title="Countdown to $200 oil: $140 oil and speculation (The Oil Drum)" href="http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4224" target="_blank">The fact is, however, that gas is so expensive because the limits of oil production are being reached while demand is ever increasing.</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://clevershark.com/2008/06/its-not-about-speculators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1777</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
