We Need to Talk About Carney

On this Canada Day in 2026, we really need to have a serious talk about the “leadership” of this country. And not in oversimplifications and trite hockey metaphors. The fact is, the barbarians aren’t at the gate. They’re in the Prime Minister’s Office. Mark Carney is the Great Canadian Bamboozle.

Swept into power after assuming the Liberal leadership after Justin Trudeau’s retirement, Carney did the two things Canada needed him to do at the time — stand up to the criminally insane Donald Trump, and save the country from the humiliation and indignity of a “Prime Minister Pierre Poilievre”, which honestly it probably wouldn’t have survived. However since that time, the mask of “great Canadian hero” has come off. Yes, Carney was an alternative to Poilievre, but sadly, that distinction has becomes little more than skin deep.

Where are the Canadian values in the Carney government? They’re just plain missing. The Prime Minister has done little for the country but consolidate power for himself by making recruiting MPs from other parties his first priority — not because he values diversity of opinion, but on the contrary, because he wants to consolidate the sort of power that a PM wields in the British Parliamentary system has an absolute majority.

And to achieve this, he has abandoned virtually every principle the Liberal Party has stood for, or at least has traditionally pretended to stand for. He has shown little but contempt for the country’s First Nations. He started his government by abandoning women’s issues, beginning with abolishing the ministry for women and gender equality and effectively relegating it as a back-burner issue. He has now officially told the country that the environment doesn’t matter, if it impacts business.

In short, he’s pretty much ruling as a Conservative. But he’s not going to tell you that.

The signs are all there, however. He waxed nostalgic about how Trudeau Senior’s national energy policy left him feeling betrayed as youth in Edmonton. He talks a good game about “data sovereignty” for Canada, but doesn’t see a problem with Canadian data being essentially controlled by Microsoft and other large American corporations. But the faux-nationalistic chest-beating and tired hockey cliches can’t hide the truth — as a country, we will be weaker than we’ve ever been in the face of the neo-liberal menace which has gradually been siphoning away everything we hold dear as a country. EI has become kind of a joke, and its decimation continues to accelerate, even as it is more needed than ever in the face of job purges led by “efficiency gains” of artificial intelligence, which Carney never fails to promote. Waiting lists in Canadian hospitals keep getting longer and longer, because Ottawa is constantly cutting transfer payments to provinces, and on top of that cutting the federal government payroll, which leads to more unemployment and a shrinking tax base not only for the provinces but also the federal government itself. The government is getting leaner and meaner with every passing month.

But oddly enough, the federal deficit is at a record high. Which would seem weird, if you didn’t realize that we’re spending hundreds of billions of dollars to push the neo-liberal accelerationism to new highs. And of course we’re doing all that without raising any taxes. I mean, Canadians are already very highly taxed, and as I’ve previously mentioned we’re getting less and less value for the value of our tax dollars, but that’s only half the story. Our corporate taxes are, frankly, a joke. The big reason why we’re paying more and getting less, as individual taxpayers, is that the overall tax burdens has shifted since the 1980s. 46 years ago the corporate sector paid a majority of the tax burden in North America. Now they pay less than half of the tax burden paid by individual taxpayers. That’s the neoliberal accelerationism I’m talking about.

So while increasing military spending and data infrastructure are not necessarily bad things, they also overwhelmingly benefit the rich and corporate interests — not even necessarily Canadian corporate interests — while the burden of paying for all this investment will fall overwhelmingly on the people, who are increasingly poorer, less cared for, and less free. That’s a reference to many bills like C22 which Carney is ushering through Parliament, something I plan to write more about later, but I want to get this piece out today.

But you wouldn’t hear about that from the Canadian corporate news media, any more than the American corporate news media mentions Donald Trump’s rapidly deteriorating mental state — which many honest observers would describe as a descent into madness. Because in the corporate world, nations no longer matter. We are effectively ruled by billionaire media owners who control what we see and hear, and Carney’s pseudo-nationalism has done a great job bamboozling the people of this country, while corporate tax cuts have sent a clear message that the rich should get on Carney’s side because he’s looking out for them.

We’re more like the USA than we like to think. We may think they’re dumb for having voted Trump in, but we’re hardly better. We took the word of an establishment figure without checking any receipts, and like our neighbors to the South we’re soon going to be facing a bill that’s much, much higher than we can imagine.

On Homelessness in Montreal

Here’s something I posted this past week on reddit but I feel it really needs to be reposted here.

I live next to the Palais des Congres, basically ground zero for homelessness in Montreal because it’s a public space so unless someone gets violent or annoying to the public they’re left in peace. For the most part the homeless don’t bother the residents, and vice-versa.

But it’s really depressing. Once you see someone new hang out here, you get to see them grow old really quickly. The general population thinks that “they messed up their lives with drugs”, which is true in some cases, but in most cases it’s the reverse — imagine that you have nothing to do all day (who’s going to hire the homeless?) and nowhere private to go to, ever. Well then, drugs quickly become the cheapest ticket to feeling good, no matter in how limited a capacity. They don’t have any “entertainment options”. Even assuming that a lot of them go to the Old Brewery Mission at night, the mission closes during the day, so they come right back. There are 2-3 distinct groups, overall they seem to respect each other’s “turf”.

Thing is, the general population — “normies” — really have no idea how close they are to being in this situation themselves. Yeah, we all dream of being millionaires or whatever, but we’re all infinitely closer to being out in the street than we are to owning a big yacht. One illness, one screw-up at work, one mistake in behavior, and that can be it. Much as people like to lie to themselves about this type of utter destitution being due to moral failings, unless you’re born into old money you’re probably teetering on the edge of that existence.

Yes, there are government programs. But we need to recognize that every year those programs are less funded than the previous year. Since the 1970s the percentage of the tax burden assumed by corporations and rich people has been on a steady decline, and that of “normies” has been rising. That started in the USA, but Canada quickly followed suit, because “we must be competitive”.

Well, “being competitive” sounds great as long as you’re on the side of the “winners”. But it necessarily also means that every year, there are more and more people on the “losing” side of the equation. It’s a sad reality.

That’s capitalism for ya.

“If it’s Boeing I ain’t going”?

Considering they’ve made probably more than half the commercial aircraft flying today, what’s coming out in the news about Boeing’s transformation since their acquisition of Mcdonnell-Douglas is frightening. Some people are even referring to the merger as a testament to the genius of MD management, because “they bought Boeing with Boeing’s money”. The Seattle giant went from being an engineering-first aircraft company to an accountant-first corporation that happened to make aircraft, and that’s when things started going wrong. Even the headquarter move to Chicago was, in hindsight, a big tell that at the corporate level engineering was no longer job #1. But it gets worse.

Suicide Mission (The American Prospect)

See also: The Strange Death of a Boeing Whistleblower (The American Prospect)

Climate change leveled up last year and it’s bad

There’s really no other way to interpret these charts showing the daily average sea surface temperature. About a year ago there was a noticeable increase in average sea temperatures, a serious bump up, and as you will be able to see from this year’s sampling this appears to be an irreversible change.

The article’s author is much more knowledgeable about the details of it so I’ll recommend you read his article: The Climate Charts Are Not Okay.

What drives a man to “suicide”?

On March 9th a man named John Mitchell Barnett was found dead in a Charleston NC hotel parking lot, victim of an apparent suicide. But this wasn’t just any ordinary schmoe, Barnett was the main whistleblower for assembly and quality issues in the Charleston Boeing plant that produced the 737 MAX.

Funny how that happened. The man dedicated the last few years of his life to exposing problems that put the entire flying public at risk, and just when the issues he warned about are making headlines, suddenly, he “commits suicide”. Come on people. Sure, he died of a gunshot wound, but I would stake a large amount of money to say that he was not the one to pull the trigger.

The Charleston County coroner ruled the wound was self-inflicted, but when you think about the amount of pull that a huge employer like Boeing have on a place the size of Charleston you realize how the wheels of justice are sometimes greased just enough by major economic players into “being team players”.

Here is a video on the man and the major safety issues he tried to warn the public about.

[embedyt] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-3nvmf9vlk[/embedyt]

How times change…

Once upon a time a Canadian didn’t think twice about visiting the United States, but in this “war on terrah” era where American officials can take a foreigner, ship him off to Syria to be tortured, and then simply refuse to have his case for redress heard in their courts because it’s inconvenient why on earth would anyone want to take that insane risk?

When this did become acceptable?

This video is astonishing. It was taken earlier today when during student protests in Montreal. In it a police officer points his tear gas grenade launcher squarely at a protester — almost touching the guy — and fires it, with the clear intent of harming the protester and making no effort whatsoever to arrest him for anything! This is absolutely, completely unacceptable and unless the sadistic officer involved is identified and disciplined in a serious way it will be difficult to take the SPVM at all seriously.

“Lawful access” — coming very soon to a computer near you

Public Security Minister Vic Toews is planning to introduce his so-called “lawful access” bill to the House of Commons later today. So, how does it measure up?

According to Ottawa U Law professor Michael Geist, it’s going to create a panopticon society where online privacy essentially no longer exists and is replaced with a sort of Big Brother. Which is pretty funny when you consider that the Tories are also about to introduce their bill to scrap the long gun registry and proactively delete any and all data therein. Apparently guns don’t kill people, but the freedom to go about one’s own business does… that pretty much tells you what you need to know about Stephen Harper and his cronies.

And then there’s the issue of cost, which is entirely offloaded onto the ISPs themselves, who will now have to keep a record of everything you do online — well, everything you do online taking the direct route via your ISP, making it trivial to circumvent — for 90 days. I rather pity the ISPs who are going to be stuck storing all that data at their own expense. You can be certain that they’ll be glad to pass the savings onto you, of course.

So what’s the justification for this garbage? Mr. Toews, never one to shy away from stooping to scrape the bottom of the barrel, claims that either you are with him or you are siding with “the child pornographers”. Never mind that there have been a number of child porn busts recently which have not required any of the new police state powers Mr. Toews insists are absolutely crucial to fight that crime. Personally I’ve always thought that it was illegal, but apparently by senile old Vic’s reckoning it was impossible to fight this crime before! Of course it wasn’t. Mr. Toews is just pulling his Maud Flanders act, and it sells out very well out West, where evidently people ignorant or mad enough to vote for the insane old codger think “internet” is a kind of potato blight.

But why should we let Vic the impaler set the terms? I say, unless you are against this so-called “lawful access” bill, you are siding with the fascists. I guess the Conservative Party has yet another self-renaming in the works.